Ministry of Finance logoTBPMSMinistry of Finance · Timor-Leste
How it worksScoringThe system
Sign in

Ministry of Finance · Timor-Leste

Team-Based Performance Management

Each division assesses its year's activities against the plan. Independent Validators review the evidence, CCMF signs off, and the results are published by division and directorate.

Sign inRequest access

For Ministry of Finance staff. Your administrator approves new accounts.

FY2025 resultsValidated
125/ 129

assessments validated, of 129 expected

Validated assessments by adjusted grade

A+5
A21
B30
C+36
C28
D+5
D0

Mean adjusted score 1.66 (C+), over 125 assessments

FY2025 in the system

17directorates
60divisions in the plan
106activities in the plan
252notes recorded by Independent Validators

How it works

Four steps from plan to published result

Every assessment follows the same path. Select a step to see who acts and what they record.

FY2026 plan check is open until 30 Nov 2026.

1 · National Directorate/Unit team

Self-assessment

The team grades each activity on timeliness, quality and effectiveness, rates its risk and its impact, records the result against the target, and attaches the evidence.

  • Kept as a draft until the team marks it ready
  • The Team Lead submits it for validation

Scoring

How a score is calculated

Three criteria are graded and averaged as Raw Score, then the Raw Score is adjusted for the activity's risk and impact.

Grade scale from FY2026

GradeValueScore rangeName
A+3.53.25 and aboveExceptional
A3.02.75-3.24Excellent
B+2.52.25-2.74Very Good
B2.01.75-2.24Good
C+1.51.25-1.74Above Satisfactory
C1.00.75-1.24Satisfactory
D+0.50.25-0.74Below Satisfactory
D0.00.00-0.24Unsatisfactory

Three criteria

TimelinessWas the activity completed on schedule?
QualityDid the output meet the required standard?
EffectivenessDid the activity achieve its intended result?

Risk and impact adjustments

+0.50Very high
+0.25High
0.00Moderate
−0.25Low
−0.50Very low

Each is added to the average raw score. The adjusted score stays between 0 and 4.5.

Try it

Choose the grades and levels to see the score an assessment would receive.

Timeliness
Quality
Effectiveness
Risk and difficulty
Impact and importance

What this score means

B+

Very Good

Between B and A.

A B is for performance above average: the activity was completed early, with better than average quality, and results slightly above what was expected.

DD+CC+BB+AA+

The three grades give an average raw score of 2.00 (B). Risk and impact change it by +0.25, to 2.25: inside the B+ range of 2.25-2.74.

Score for your choices
TimelinessB
QualityB+
EffectivenessC+
Average raw score2.00 · B
Risk and difficultyHigh · +0.25
Impact and importanceModerate · 0.00
Adjusted score2.25B+

(Timeliness + Quality + Effectiveness) ÷ 3, plus risk and impact.

Risk and impact together

Each cell is what the two levels add to the average raw score. Select a cell to set both.

Risk ↓
Impact →
Very lowLowModerateHighVery high
Very highHighModerateLowVery low
−1.00+1.00
High risk · lower impact−0.25 to +0.50
High risk · high impact+0.50 to +1.00
Lower risk · lower impact−1.00 to 0.00
Lower risk · high impact−0.25 to +0.50

High means High or Very high, as in the score distribution report.

The system

One system for each part of the process

For division teams

Plan, assess and track

Each team sees its activities for the year, what is still to be assessed, and where each assessment stands in validation.

  • Evidence files and comments on each assessment
  • Progress for each activity: draft, ready, in validation, validated

For Independent Validators and CCMF

Review with a full record

The validation queue lists assessments by stage. Each adjustment carries a justification, and the history shows the values at every stage.

  • Queues for submitted, revised and awaiting sign-off
  • The team's submission and every later value side by side
A→B
B→B
B→C+

For leadership

Results by division and directorate

League tables rank divisions and directorates at any stage of validation. Results pages and the organisation analysis show what changed in validation and why.

  • Raw and adjusted scores, with risk and impact
  • Exports and PDFs for the annual report
1
2
3
4
5

Ministry of Finance staff

Sign in with your Ministry account. If you do not have one, request access and your administrator will review the request.

Sign inRequest access
TBPMSTeam-Based Performance Management System (TBPMS) of the Ministry of Finance, Timor-Leste.

Links

Sign inRequest accessHow it worksScoring

Support

Questions about your account or an assessment:Ministry of Financenbarreto@mof.gov.tlAFIjanuario@artificialfiscalintelligence.com
© 2025 Ministry of Finance, Timor-LesteDeveloped and maintained by AFI
Powered by Artificial Fiscal Intelligence